Deze week mag ik voorpagina sieren van De Scheveninger, een blad met een oplage van 30.000 stuks. Heel blij en trots op. Bijgaand tevens de bijbehorende tekst.

Gyuri Vergouw · Joeri · Scheveniger · Vergouw · weekblad

Dear Mr Koeman,

The European Football Championship is about to start. The undersigned also has a lot of appreciation and respect for your coaching contribution to Oranje. However, I think I would do well to inform you about what is probably the biggest hurdle that has to be overcome for the Dutch national team if it wants to achieve success. In one area I believe I can give you well-founded advice. An advice that all your predecessors ignored, with disastrous consequences for Dutch football. It’s about the penalty. I realize that facts do not often encourage people to change, but since the year 2000 time has certainly done its work. Younger generations trust that the Dutch players will be well prepared and trained for a possible penalty shootout. The time of excuses and fallacies, especially that it is a lottery and an untrainable factor, is now really over.

The master and the students

The penalty is of course a topic that will appeal to you. You were a master at it yourself and scored around 94% of the penalties you took. A lot better than the players you are training now, who often do not score higher than around 70%. In short, you missed one in 25 penalties, an average Dutch player quickly missed one in three. So it’s time to finally pay serious attention to this. I know that, as you say, you make many decisions ‘by feeling’. That is sometimes a wise decision, but certainly not when it comes to taking penalties. As Cruyff said: ‘Penalties have little to do with football’. I would therefore like to give you some tips and tricks that will bring you closer to success. It concerns concrete, football-technical and psychological elements. These aspects are based on intensive and worldwide research by many renowned researchers, athletes and journalists. Facts may not change people, but I hope and firmly believe that you and the team can certainly benefit greatly from this. A winning advantage, even.

Background: KNVB mailroom

The fact that I chose the unusual way of communicating via an open letter has a long history. Since the year 2000, I have been trying to inform national coaches about the knowledge available about taking good and successful penalties. All your predecessors ignored this knowledge and advice. In fact, I never received a response to any of the letters I sent to the KNVB headquarters, including to your predecessors Frank Rijkaard, Dick Advocaat, Louis van Gaal and Marco van Basten. I am firmly convinced that this has cost the Dutch team at least one (European or World) title. After all, the Dutch lost in 2000, 2014 and 2022 after taking (very) poorly taken penalties and therefore did not reach the final (or next round). And previously in 1994, 1996 and 1998, the Dutch team had been eliminated from a major tournament after penalties. That can really be improved! In fact, the chance of winning a title without winning a shoot-out during the tournament has now become very small.

The Dutch team, together with England, is one of the worst national teams in the world, despite the talent available. This has everything to do with our football culture. As long as we continue to talk about a lottery in the Netherlands when it comes to penalties, the series of losses will continue to grow. In fact, this approach even makes a significant contribution! Players will perform worse if this is the starting point. After all, they know immediately that the chance of missing is high. While a player with the knowledge and skills to take a good penalty realizes that the chance that he/she will score is high. The choice for this is ours, not up to chance.

The code

You can read my story and many other tips and tricks in my recently published English work Cracking the Penalty Code, Winning a shootout in football. In English, because I compared the English team and the Dutch team (benchmarking) against successful penalty countries such as Germany, the Czech Republic and Argentina (see the basic data below). If people in the Netherlands do not want to listen, I assure you that the English team now has one (and even several) listening ears. Not every country wants to keep bumping into the same stone. In this open letter I will now give you three tips that will bring you a lot closer to a successful penalty shootout.

Let me start with a score table that clearly illustrates how poorly the Dutch team and England (The Three Lions) perform in terms of the penalty kick. The table shows the scoring percentages of the aforementioned countries at European Championships and World Cups during penalty series.

Vergouw’s Penalty Scoring Table©

Scoring percentage

Above 95% Excellent Czech Republic

90-95% Very good

85-89% Good Germany

80-84% Sufficient

75-79% Average Argentina

70-74% Below average

65-69% Bad The Netherlands

64% and below Very bad England

I can explain this table easily. If the Netherlands or England have to take five penalties against Germany, the English will most likely miss two and the Germans will miss a maximum of one. The Netherlands misses one in three penalties, Germany one in about seven. I don’t think I need to explain which country wins when five penalties have to be taken. And then I’m not talking about the Czechs, who, by the way, have never missed a penalty in 20 attempts only at the European Championships (NB: the Dutch team missed 12 out of 37 attempts).

Preparation and technique

It is up to the coach and the accompanying team to properly prepare the players for a possible penalty shootout. The importance of this has now dawned on all participating countries, in the last ten years almost no title or final place during a major tournament has been achieved or won without winning at least one shootout during the tournament. The last European Championship and World Cup are examples of this, in the latter case by, not entirely surprisingly, beating the Dutch team. The Orange seemed ‘prepared’ but stepped into the hole it had dug itself. The background to this can be read in my analyzes in the book, but in short, ‘making war in the sixteen’ is not really a Dutch force.

The preparation does not consist of having players at their club take 3,000 penalties in wasted hours without proper instructions, as your former colleague Luis Enrique did with the Spanish national team (all players missed their penalty during the last World Cup). It is about giving the players instructions on how and where to place the ball, making the right run-up, and directing the ball with the right strength and technique. These are elements that are easy to train. An example is the Panenka, which I see in many forms in competitions, but rarely performed correctly. Many players believe that a soft ball through the middle is sufficient, but forget that the ‘inventor’ of this penalty took a quick run-up of six meters to deceive the keeper. So many players actually only take half a Panenka. That’s almost a guarantee of a flop.

In short, clear instructions about how players can and must take a penalty are necessary. You cannot leave this to the players themselves or to players who come to you after the match with the feeling that they are ‘enjoyed in the match’. And also not to players who want to ‘take responsibility’. Are they psychologically ready for this, or are they overconfident? That can be determined in advance! And do you already have the list of 26 players in order, based on training data? So that you don’t have to run around with a piece of paper after extra time asking players whether or not they want to take a penalty? After all, that increases stress for players, trainers and in any case for 8 million households in the Netherlands. And yes, all players should be included on this list, in order. After all, injuries will occur, players will be changed, series will become longer, etc. Make sure all players know what is expected of them when it comes to penalties. Before the European Championships!

No lottery

Only in the Netherlands and England is there a prevailing feeling that the penalty shootout is a lottery, over which neither players nor coaches can influence. You can read the background to this idea and the reason why this idea is predominant in the Netherlands in my book. It seems to take stress off the player, and absolves everyone of responsibility, before and after. However, it creates an unintentional side effect, unconsciously but no less disastrously. Calling a penalty shootout a lottery actually increases players’ stress! If you know in advance that the penalty is nothing more than a lottery, in other words, that you have no influence on it yourself, the chance of you missing increases. How different is it if you are well prepared, then the responsibility actually lies with you and the chance that you will score increases. At least if you are well prepared.

A penalty shootout is only a lottery if both countries do not practice on it, as in 2004 between the Netherlands and Sweden. Then the luckiest person wins. If one of the two countries trains for it, the training country almost always wins. What if both countries practice? That’s what I call professionalism and we can look forward to a long series. May the best win! You can find it clearly in the matrix below.

The Penalty Shoot-out Matrix © Gyuri Vergouw

Germany

England

No training

Training

No training

Lottery

Germany wins

Training

England wins

Professionalism

Training for stress

I assume you have logged a lot of flying hours in your career. How would you sit in your seat knowing that the pilot has never practiced for all possible weather conditions and emergencies? ‘Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard, we’re about to take off, I still have to see how everything works, but don’t worry, things rarely go wrong?’ No, pilots, even if they have been flying for decades, regularly practice in simulators to be well prepared and to function under high pressure and stress. The same applies to police officers who train for riots or hostage situations, military personnel who train for dangerous assignments… it is a matter of life or death. How much stress do you want to simulate?

Would training on a penalty kick be impossible? Stress, because there are millions of people watching? Certainly, but there are five times as many Germans on our planet, don’t they suffer from stress? And why not?

There are now many scientific studies that indicate that stress can indeed be trained. Perhaps you can study video footage of Cristiano Ronaldo. After the referee’s whistle, you can see that Ronaldo takes a moment to concentrate and takes one or two deep breaths, the best way to gain focus and release stress. (NB: do you also include this element in training? Training without a referee (or someone who takes on this role) has little point in practicing, the referee determines the moment of the decision, not the player).

I can give you many tips for goalkeepers, from focusing on the players’ standing leg, waiting when players are running short, etc., but let me not go into too much detail. If you are not convinced, think back to the goalkeeper change with Tim Krul. Presented in 2000 in various media (including Barend & Van Dorp) as a winning option (originating from ice hockey) but ridiculed by the ‘experts’. They were of course full of admiration in 2014 when Louis van Gaal put this into practice. My positive experiences with the women’s teams, which in my experience are more open to change and information that can improve them in the game, can also be found in my new book.

Wrapping up

The Dutch cannot become champions if the penalty kick is not trained seriously. In this article I gave you three main points, there are more and more detailed ones to mention. That defeats the purpose of this letter. My most important point is and remains: the tips bring a possible title a lot closer! Clinging to the “it’s a lottery” mantra guarantees anxious players and losses. It is in the interest of Dutch football that you break the vicious circle of fallacies.

I wish you, your coaching team and the players every success during the upcoming European Championship.

Yours sincerely,

Gyuri Vergouw

Vergouw has been associated with ManagementSite as editor-in-chief since 1997. In 2000 he wrote the classic football book De Strafschop, to international acclaim. Cracking the Penalty Code was recently published. In this new penaltypublication he discusses 25 years of penalty investigation and experience. The book is available as eBook worldwide and as paperback in The Netherlands and Flanders.

https://www.ebook.nl/ebook/9789083339030-cracking-the-penalty-code-george-vergouw/

BBC · Cracking the Penalty Code · Dutch team · England · Euro 2024 · Football · Koeman · Oranje · penalty · Professor Penalty · shootout · strafschop · Three Lions

Enkele van de eerste reacties op het Labyrint van de ziel

Een prachtige roman over persoonlijk leiderschap en -integriteit, hoe blijf je trouw aan jezelf en aan je principes. Een must read!
Claudia Geene
Executive Coach/ Greenleaf Academy for Servant Leadership

Een voor mij vruchtbaar boek met mooie zinnen en dialogen. Het verhaal is lichtvoetig geschreven, doet denken aan Alice in wonderland, waardoor de levenslessen makkelijk zijn op te nemen. Er wordt veel verteld in slechts 200 pagina’s maar ik krijg nergens het gevoel dat het te snel gaat.
Hans Almhof
Auteur van o.m. Storm in het brein

Hoe zou het zijn als ik echt naar mijn kern zou reizen. Het labyrint van de ziel biedt een antwoord op deze vraag. Een spannend, wijs en humorvol boek over de essentie van het leven.
Sven Goedbloed
Consultant, gids van executives

Verkrijgbaar bij Bol.com, Amazon.nl, Businezz.nl, Managementboek.nl en alle andere boeken verkoopadressen.

boek · coaching · Labyrint · lezersreacties · magisch · realisme · recensies · roman · spiritueel · Vergouw · Ziel

Begin december 2021 verscheen ‘Het labyrint van de ziel’, de nieuwe magische, spirituele roman van auteur Gyuri Vergouw. Opmerkelijk, want de schrijver staat top op heden bekend als auteur van non-fictieboeken als De Strafschop en Het dodo-effect, maar komt nu met een magisch verhaal vol mythische wezens.

‘Het labyrint van de ziel’ is een mythische vertelling die de lezer hoop en inspiratie biedt en inzicht geeft in de mogelijkheden om levensvragen zélf te beantwoorden. De roman is geïnspireerd door klassieke werken als de Odyssee, maar evenzeer door spirituele auteurs als Paulo Coelho (De alchemist) en James Redfield (De Celestijnse belofte). Het verhaal sluit daarnaast aan bij stromingen als de positieve psychologie.
Hoofdrolspeler Jason Leonard dreigt in ‘Hat labyrint van de ziel’ na een schipbreuk alles in zijn leven kwijt te raken. Hij belandt op een onbekend eiland waar hij een mysterieuze grot binnentreedt. Zo wordt hij een labyrint vol magische, mythologische figuren binnengeleid. Deze figuren geven hem raad om persoonlijk te groeien maar Leonard zal zélf de keuzes moeten maken die hem uit zijn benarde positie zullen bevrijden.
‘Juist in deze voor veel mensen moeilijke tijden is een vertelling die hoop en mogelijkheden tot zelfreflectie en groei biedt van belang’, aldus Vergouw, ‘De roman valt te lezen als een magische en spannend verhaal, maar evenzeer als een zelfontwikkelingsboek. Het is mede gebaseerd op vele honderden coaching gesprekken die ik heb gevoerd en de vragen waar mensen in het heden mee worstelen, waaronder onderwerpen als work-life balance, levensgeluk en relatievragen.’
Auteur Gyuri Vergouw wordt in zijn dagelijks werk als coach en adviseur geconfronteerd met levensvragen van cliënten. In Het labyrint van de ziel heeft hij zijn kennis hiervan op inspirerende wijze verwerkt. Zijn oeuvre omvat inmiddels elf titels, waaronder titels als De Strafschop, die hem internationaal de geuzennaam professor penalty opleverde, en Het dodo effect. Hij is al bijna 25 jaar hoofdredacteur van managementsite.nl, met bijna 100.000 online leden een groot managementforum. Ook organiseerde hij tienmaal het NK Air Guitar. Vergouw is voormalig bestuurslid en penningmeester van Paradiso en huidig voorzitter van de raad van toezicht van poppodium Melkweg, beiden in Amsterdam.

Het labyrint van de ziel
Auteur: Gyuri Vergouw
ISBN 978-90-805317-7-2
Uitgeverij Vergouw Publishing
Prijs € 20,–

No tags

Door de redactie van het vakblad van de Orde van organisatieadviseurs (Ooa), Management & Consultant Quarterly (M&C) werd ik enige tijd geleden gevraagd een artikel te schrijven op basis van mijn boek De managementmonologen. Het zou moeten aansluiten bij het thema van het nummer: ‘Vakmanschap’. Daar is ‘De onmisbare consultant’ uit voortgekomen, dat je hier als bijlage kan downloaden. Ik ben zelf vooral tevreden over de openingsalinea;-)MC 2018 Q3 Vergouw – De Onmismare Consultant

Gyuri · Joeri · M&C · managementboek · managementmonologen · monologen · Quarterly · vakamanschap · Vergouw

Het dodo-effect is het onderwerp van het cover-artikel van de mand september in het veelgelezen ManagementBoek magazine, oplage ruim 50.000. het boek staat inmiddels op #1in de rubriek Verandermanagement en op #18 in de algemene charts, de tweede druk is vorige week verschenen.

Dodo-effect Scan Interview MM

dodo · dodo-effect · Gyuri Vergouw · Magazine · managementboek · onderstroom

Klik op de link om het interview en de column over Big Data te downloaden.

Accountantweek interview en column

Accountant · Accountant Week · Big Data · hofnar · kwaliteit · nieuwe · NOVAK · raadsheer · Vergouw · vertrouwenspersoon

Op ManagementSite.nl, met meer dan 80000 leden een van de grootste managementsites van Nederland, een mooie recensie van Prof. Dr. Lisa van de Bunt, hoogleraar management & organisatie: ‘Al met al een heel goed leesbaar boek met vele praktische tips voor het goed leiden van veranderingen in organisaties.’

boek · dodo-effect · gedragsverandering · Gyuri · managementsite · recensie · Vergouw

Het dodo effect is boek van de maand in Management Team! Bijgaand de recensie:

Vreemde wezens in organisaties

In de stroom dodelijk saai geschreven managementboeken is het nieuwste werk van Gyuri Vergouw een verademing. Dat komt bijvoorbeeld omdat hij zich bedient van wat hij zelf noemt ‘praktijktheorie’: theoretische verhandelingen, gelardeerd met aansprekende voorbeelden uit de praktijk. Maar niet alleen die aanpak maakt het boek leesbaarder dan dat van veel van zijn collega’s, het zijn ook de mooie fenomenen die hij beschrijft: van ‘injaloetitis’ (een combinatie van jaloezie en incompetentie) tot de Trivialiteitswet van Parkinson (‘De tijd die tijdens een vergadering aan een onderwerp wordt besteed, is omgekeerd evenredig met het bedrag dat ermee gemoeid is’), en van de paradox van Abilene (‘niemand wil het, toch doen we het, omdat we denken dat de ander het wil’) tot de paradox met van Cobb (‘We weten waarom projecten mislukken, we weten ook hoe dat te voorkomen, waarom komt er dan geen eind aan de mislukkingen?).

‘Mensen zijn vreemde wezens, maar we lijken onszelf in gekte en irrationaliteit te overtreffen als we samenkomen in organisaties’, concludeert Vergouw. Zoals het een goed adviseur betaamt, plakt hij daar meteen wat do’s en don’ts achteraan. Die zich overigens weer uitstekend laten samenvatten met een zin: ‘ Toon compassie met je collega’s, we doen allemaal ons best, maar zijn nu eenmaal allemaal menselijk.’

Het dodo-effect

dodo-effect · Management Team · recensie · Vergouw

Mooie reacties en recensies op Bondscoach!, nu al op weg nar 2 maanden in de managementboek top 100. ‘Bondscoach! is een must voor elke trainer met ambities..Een fraai boek dat we van harte kunnen aanbevelen.’ De Pingelieer, blad van RIOS ‘31. Boek van de maand. Boek van de week bij Voetbal International. En te horen en zien geweest bij Met het oog op morgen, Knooppunt Kranenbarg, Radio 2, School TV en op managementsite.nl, Managementboek Magazine.nl, SportXL en Sportgeschiedenis.nl..en er zal nog veel meer komen…

Bondscoach! · radio · recensies · strafschoppen · tv · Vergouw